While doing a little housekeeping on my site I rediscovered this presentation I did a couple years ago on Enterprise Content Management and Federal Enterprise ArchitectureBuying Zithromax, . It was for the Gilbane conference on content management technologies in government, buy zithromax without prescription. Clarithromycin zithromax the same, My notes from the conference are also available.
There is audio of the Presentation [40MB MP3] and a related article in Government Computer News (GCN): Blending FEA into the enterprise, zithromax price wal mart or publix. Zithromax tri pak, Additional resources are available on del.icio.us for FEA, CM, zithromax strep throat, Zithromax for healing polymyositis, enterprise IA. No prescription zithromax. Zithromax expired. Azithromycin zithromax paypal. Us zithromax free perscription. Buy zithromax no prescription. Buy online azithromycin zithromax. Website for zithromax. Zithromax over the counter. Us zithromax mastercard. Zithromax with overnight shipping. Zithromax 250 mg tabs. Zithromax tums interaction. Zithromax z-pak oral. Discount zithromax without a prescription. Zithromax acne vulgaris.
Nexium Over The Counter, I attended this year's Environmental Protection Agency Web Work Group conference in Crystal City. As always, thallium stress test nexium, Nexium uk, there were a few stand-out sessions. This year, coupon nexium, Allergic nexium, the MVP was the Office of Water's case study on their recent web conversion. You can read more about it near the end of the post, nexium gernerics. Coupons for nexium,
Susan Fagan - Taxonomy
faceted
BRM is major component
some facets may be required
planned metadata-driven IA (!)
they do have a mockup
Susan Fagan - Search Folders
training sets - 7 docs to train, 3 to test each topic
UI in progress
search algorithm done
John Shirey - Search
99.7% converted to Northern Light
john's mantra: accurate, nexium bone marrow, Nexium generic prices, timely and complete
John Shirey - Web CMS
pilots
harvesting content and metadata
product: Battelle Universal Parsing Agent
business processes identified
use cases in development by Susan Fagan
looking to push to production
switching from TSMS to CoreID
excellent user interface mockup
mentioned Synaptica, API expected
cv is ready in staging in Documentum
content intelligence services (CIS) demo
next steps
harvest OSW pages
demo content entry process
demo integration with MS Word
honestly pessimistic about money to do all this
Annetta Cheek - Plain Language
same presentation as last time...
Don Barrett - Accessibility
504 make accommodation for people (wheelchair)
508 make accessible environment (ramp)
not a lot of take-aways, nexium purple pill comparison, Nexium prescriptions, but a really excellent talk!
Jakita Bass - Strategic Planning for Web - Case Study
global warming case study
ranked #1 on google's results for "global warming"
but content outdated; not linked in to new content; usability and IA bad
I spoke at the Gilbane conference on content management technologies in governmentRetin Buy, on Wednesday. It was a good conference experience, and I hope they do it again next year. There were about 50 attendees, .025 retin a, so it had the personal intimate feel of a retreat. The attendee list seemed to be balanced 50/50 between feds and consultants. Retin advanced guestbook 2.4, There were three plenaries and eight pairs of sessions in two tracks. Almost all the sessions were case studies, which was amazing, Retin Buy. The conference was in the Reagan Building downtown, which is just fabulous. The food was good, skin care with retin a, although the space for lunch was a bit odd. There were about fifteen vendor tables from a range of companies. Alternatives to retin a, Paying the bills and so forth. Tony Byrne of CMSWatch Retin Buy, was the conference chair, and he definitely did a good job selecting speakers.
I spoke about Content Management and the Federal Enterprise Architecture. I got good feedback and a number of interesting questions. My favorite was whether the Business Reference Model (a government-wide taxonomy of business functions) is appropriate for the public as a means of organizing government content. My answer was 'probably not' since the BRM is meant to be a back office artifact used for planning, retin topical. It uses language that is inappropriate for the general public. Maybe the general organization scheme might be useful even if the specific labels aren't, Retin Buy. But that asks the question - is there a taxonomy of the whole federal government's operations that is appropriate for the general public. Retin a gel, I believe OMB or GAO maintains a taxonomy intended for librarians (I need to do more research obviously). But librarians are not the general public, and taxonomies for libraries may or may not be appropriate for the web. Firstgov has gone down that road a bit, retin a poisoning, but they have struggled - the problem is very difficult. Retin Buy, (Full disclosure - the original question was from someone who works at Firstgov).
I took copious notes in seven sessions, Retin scar, which I've included verbatim after the break...
business-driven - place IT under control of business decisions and executive leadership
IT performance measurement - improve effectiveness and efficiency of gov't
budget planning
identify redundancies
gap analysis
opportunities for collaboration between agencies
made of 5 reference models
what's a reference model?
Performance Reference Model (PRM)
Business Reference Model (BRM)
Service Component Reference Model (SRM)
Technical Reference Model (TRM)
Data Reference Model (DRM)
how does ECM fit into the FEA.
no content reference model
(unstructured) content supported in DRM, retin a micro wrinkle, at the bottom of the stack
content services might be supported in SRM
how does the FEA help with ECM.
BRM functions taxonomy
intro to the BRM
foundation of the whole FEA
high-level taxonomy of all govt functions
functional NOT organizaitonal
designed to compare govt functions across agencies
and to provide a business-based anchor for all the other models
not appropriate granularity for workflow
not (necessarily) appropriate lingo for agency public affairs
Lines of Business
mission
from a citizen's perspective, Retin de cellulite, what does the agency do. (e.g, Retin Buy. EPA manages environment, FCC regulates spectrum, State conducts foreign affairs)
resource mgmt
common res, oily skin retin a. mgmt. functions for all orgs (e.g. Retin a body moisturizer, HR or Financial Mgmt)
mission support
agency-specific support functions (like inspector general)
mode of delivery
how is the mission delivered (e.g. grants to states or direct federal services?)
Examples
Services to Citizens
Environmental Management
Environmental Monitoring and Forecasting
Environmental Remediation
Site and Area Evaluation and Cleanup
Clean Up Contaminated Land
Site Assessment
Sampling and Analysis
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
Community Involvement
Remedy Selection
Remedial Action
Operations and Maintenance
Perform Removals
Federal Facilities Restoration
Pollution Prevention and Control
Disaster Management
Disaster Preparedness and Planning
Emergency Response
Natural Disaster Response
Anthropogenic Spills and Incidents Response
International Affairs and Commerce
Law Enforcement
Mode of Delivery
Regulatory Compliance and Enforcement
Federal Financial Assistance
Support Delivery of Services
Controls and Oversight
Internal Risk Management and Mitigation
Legislative Relations
Planning and Resource Allocation
Public Affairs
Regulatory Development
Applied Research and Science Support
Legal Services
Management of Government Resources
Administrative Management
Financial Management
Human Resource Management
Information and Technology Management
Supply Chain Management
DRM data exchange model
Retin Buy, common framework to describe, categorize, and share data
Data Description: Provides a means to uniformly describe data, thereby supporting its discovery and sharing.
data discovery
data reuse
data sharing
data harmonization
semantic interoperability
Data Context: Facilitates discovery of data through an approach to the categorization of data according to taxonomies.
Communities of Interest agree on taxonomies for categorization
Internal and external COI
Explicit connections to the BRM
Data Sharing: Supports the access and exchange of data where access consists of ad- hoc requests (such as a query of a data asset), and exchange consists of fixed, cream retin wrinkle, re- occurring transactions between parties. Enabled by capabilities provided by both the Data Context and Data Description standardization areas
SRM services framework
a taxonomy of IT service components
organized horzontally across busines functions
promotes reuse and collaboration of IT service components across governement
PRM IT systems performance
a taxonomy of performance measures
Common language to describe outputs and measures
comparative resource allocation - which programs are most effective and efficient. Canada retin a micro gel,
line of sight visibility between inputs and outputs
Paul Fontain, FAA - iECM
requirements at FAA
trying to integrate all their disparate ECM functions
work with E-Gov initiatives
records management
FOIA
E-Government Act
Presidential directives
federal enterprise architecture
Federal Ent. Arch, Retin Buy. Framework vs. DoD EAF
president's management agenda
citizen-centric, retin a still have open pores, results-oriented, market-based
stovepipes at FAA
each stovepipe had its own tightly integrated stack of applications
but no cross-stovepipe communication/integration
OMB rotated the stacks - now they are integrated federal-wide, Buy generic retin a, but there is no vertical integration
3 approaches
standardization
pick one product, more everybody to it
advantages
cheaper
simpler contracting
simpler support
simpler infrastructure
disadvantages
everyone compromises
no single product meets all requirements
migration of existing stuff
vendor dependence
change management
external interfaces
not an option for cross-enterprise solutions
integration
build point-to-point integration between apps
advantages
relatively quick
disadvantages
high development cost
proprietary nature of enterprise application integration apps
Nx integrations
interoperability
any app can speak to any other app or its info anywhere on the network
386 staff and contractors authorized to post to the web site
2 years ago
no formal structure or representation
CIO's office ran the site and infrastructure
grass roots web work group
mgmt roles not defined
OPA takes interest in the web site -> tension with CIO's ofc
web governance task force established
today
formal governance structure
web council
nat'l web content manager
nat'l web infrastructure manager
content and infr, retin veins face spider. coordinators from every program
OPA - content
OEI - infrastructure
46 people on this council
how it is going
formal structure instituted by EPA Administrator
many informal policies collected into a huge omnibus formal policy, approved by web council and agency policy-making board
web standards, Back acne retin a, approved by council
what didn't work
web council meeting failed
contractors sent out to figure out what went wrong
interviews with council members
council members didn't feel empowered
council didn't go back to programs and evangelize for decisions
what worked
required decisions, not just rubber-stamp
make members work together
meeting is in conjunction with larger web workgroup to make the two distinct
Renee Truillo Lockhart, SSA
about SSA.GOV
since 1994
50k pages
109 web masters
2.2 million transactions
why did they need governance
succession planning
multiple OMB mandates
no formal structure or governance
CMS - can't automate business processes that aren't documented (or don't exist)
areas of governance
web content
web applications
web strategy
working group created a web steeting committee and gave them a mandate (and created a temporary governance sub-cmte)
document procedures
escalation procedures
roles and responsibilities
formalize and publish procedures
implement standards and infrastructure
recommend web enforcement policies
disseminate standards
train on procedures
identify all web work groups
identify
roles and responsibilities
overlap/redundancy identification
escalation procedures
establish how related to web working group
establish communications
lessons learned
executive buy-in across the enterprise is critical to success
create a sense of urgency; state the business imperative
promote the concept that Content Management is more than a system - it's governance
document policies, standards and controls; assign roles and responsibility for accountability
CMS should leverage governance, order retin a without prescription, not create it
Sheila question
staffing changes
staff performance measures
PDs for content-specific roles
lisa - not a lot more content-specific job postings
right skills
Open-Source CMS in the Federal Sector
Seth Gottleib, Optaros
is it still a classic build vs. Retin Buy, buy decision. Retin de mexique,
in either case, you buy things AND build things
x2 - x4 license cost in customization, minimum
plus databases and other infrastructure tools
when to use a open source CMS
when you have a business process that is common and well solved by an open source product
lower cost of basic purchase to focus funding and effort on customization
want to standardize on a platform (for many coordinated non-competing groups)
CM use cases
informational website
examples
corporate identity
departmental intranet site
online information resource
requirements
page centric design
compliance
ease of use/WYSIWYG
products
Magnolia
tree of pages
in-content editing
rigid page architecture - no reuse
no workflow (?)
online periodical
examples
ezine
online version of a print magazine or newspaper
requirements
new pages all the time
workflow (roles)
flexible presentation tier
high traffic
products
bricolage
MacWorld
workflow based on 'desks'
apache lenya
NZZ-online (die Zeit?)
midgard
zope CMF
boston globe
san diego union tribune
collaborative workspace
examples
project team space
document repository
requirements
very efficient UI - must compete w email
security
versioning (but people often don't get it)
desktop integration
products
document management
Alfresco
documentum people
adding web content soon
Knowledge Tree
php
webdav
wikis
mediawiki
twiki
hybrid
CPS
collab tool
doc mgmt cmty
Open sTeam
Plone
weak versioning model
strong cmty
online community
slashdot
community of practice
platform for custom development
why
you just want the platform anyway
investing in a proprietary product is risky
adherence to open standards is critical
scalable solution
framework
buy the common pieces
build the unique stuff
figure out how much you can buy
don't make the system do something it can't/shouldn't
government of New Zealand
based on Plone
fully compliant with ALL their standards
make a local copy and customize
local look and feel in CSS
multilingual supported natively in Plone
community of feds run this version
larger Plone community supports basic technology
how to be successful
identify a community - active and aligned with your needs
contribute back to cmty anything you don't want to maintain solely (use the cmty)
control scope
only customize to solve unique problems
have people live with the defaults first, before planning customizations (pilot and get feedback)
select right support options
focus on non-technology factors that really drive success
good content
training
information architecture
invest money saved on technology for these other things
W, renova retin vs. Page Glennie, Department of the Navy
background
office supports head of acquisitions for Dept of the Navy
policy writing
facilitate and improve the acquisition system
180k civilians, Affirm retin, military, industry use their policy
$60B in major acquisitions
problem
create a new public web site
reduce operating costs by 60%
maintain 10 years worth of policy
decrease time for updates (minutes)
multiple non-technical personnel to maintain the content (no contractor support for content)
implementation
approach
market research analysis
contractor
evaluated open source and COTS
evaluation criteria
functional requirments spec
govt usage
dev support (community, user groups)
available documentation
selection
eZ Publish
95% of manditory requirements
free
topical sections with own managers
easy interface for non-technical content creators
large community of support
results
acquisition.navy.mil
saving $400k per year
2.5 years of implementation
vendor support down from 4 people to 1.5
people maintain their own content
Making RM Invisible
Tim Sprehe
taking RM out of user hands
...as much as possible
devise ways to make records capture in the background
business rules for capture (user role, nature of LoB, retin a reviews, nature of document)
workflow analysis - know when decisions made, what record is needed to record the decision
Carol Brock, GAO
intro to GAO
document mgmt early adopter
1200 blue books (investigation reports) annually
what they do
audits/investigations
administration
policy
project background
requirements
easy to use
almost invisible to end users
DoD 5015.2
had a document mgmt solution, with no records functions
solution overview
based on document profiles (metadata)
records decisions in workflow
invisible to users
sits on top of doc mgmt solution - enables retention decision
a single retention descision with three options
mission
administration
policy
and the system remembers the user's default profile
rather risk having too much than too little, so over capture
3 retention schedules, pilot with NARA for this kind of solution
intentionally overly simple
5 years for all mission recs
permanent policy and special collections
7 years for all administration
not automatic destruction - they ask the owners, espcially about holds like litigation
separate category for 'knowledge base' with 10 year 'reference' retention
simple file plans
not mimicing paper filing
each major bucket has a different (single) organization scheme
functions
operations
jobs/projects
user decision to save draft as record
global read access to metadata, but docs may be secured
personal profile(s)
more than one per person
one per project/person
project metadata built in, included on every document created
creation IN CONTEXT
document locks
entire project bucket locks all at once
so, documents not individually locked
and, all saves are to the record bucket, but it's open until the whole thing locks
30 days to change things
then completely locked
but can open and reuse documents (saved as new version)
hummingbird is vendor
26 suscessful pilots
includes interns and contractors
$425k per year on backlog reduction
104 users
pilot objectives
access user acceptance
identify burden on staff
identify best practices
measure processes
evaluate perceptions
lessons learned
big buckets take some getting used to
you can't do ERM without EDM
must be inherent part of business system
onsite vendor support needed
lots of IT support (she's KM)
next steps
portals for projects
workflow
collaboration
Denise Bedford, World Bank
problem statement
volume of info increasing
rm requirements growing
no strong approach for RM of electronic records
not an end of lifecycle function - must be full lifecycle
paper-based approach insufficient
dissemination of electronic tools to staff causes serious risk of records lost and unauthorized publications
vision
staff use templates within the context of a business process and task - they can't just open up Word and start - they must start with the task and the template
metadata hidden in template, filled in by user as part of normal document creation
template knows where it belongs - a 'best guess', and knows how it should be managed
reuse of document parts automatically inherits original metadata
filing is synonymous with saving - it happens seamlessly and in the background
can infer/distinguish record copies from convenience copies
realizing the vision
institutionally comprehensive retention schedules
functionally organized
authority file of organization units
metadata repository with links back to source system
rules-based retention and disposition expert system
management reporting tools
absolute requirement that all systems meet minimum metadata compatibility rules
content owner rentention actions 'fail up' to records managers as an escalation
must have agreement on business process functions (like the BRM)
security classification of individual metadata elements
she has a slide with an ER diagram for this
Washington Post - Large Web Publishing Systems
Chris Contakes - WashingtonPost.com
intro/team
10 java developers
CMS
dynamic apps
washingtonpost.com
budgettravelonline.com
newsweek.com
slate.com
CMS solution
washingtonpost.com
budgettravelonline.com
same CMS (really?)
custom built solution
largely automated
uses terragram for autoclassification and indexing for search
everything rendered statically in preview and FTPed to production
template driven
all text is plain text
custom content entry interface - XML on the backend
130,000 publishing trips (FTP uploads) per day
CMS challenges
every content item has a 'context' element, so the system knows what site it applies to
publish 5000 items per day
about 10M pag views per day
for dynamic applications - database apps are replicated out to a public DB
so things like MyWashingtonPost are actually rendered from a static copy of the content
Alec Dann - PostNewsweek Tech Media
iProduction is vendor on CMS
had 114 templates (many fewer now)
XML-based now
challenge of the future
web design changes
huge monitors, huge resolution
various forms of syndication and presentation
visual media
video
RIAs
migration of content is hard
coding in the pages
coding in the templates
generalization
page elements
lists of things
content elements
composition tool for making templates, basically a template for templates
internal use of RSS for exchange, stored search
Sheila Campbell - Future of Federal Web
about FirstGov.gov
office of citizen services within GSA
firstgov.gov
citizen info
web managers advisory council
webcontent.gov
best practices
community
training
2011
ubiqitous internet - always on
wireless/internet as a government service
implications for content and format
10 predictions
dramatically fewer government web sites and government web pages
design debate will be over - basic layout will be common (for government)
US Government sites will have a common look and feel
No government website will be launched or continued without testing with the people who use it
.gov naming convention will make sense to the public
3641 .gov domains
1500 federal
1868 state or other local
82 sovereign nations
interesting commentary on the value of a top-level government taxonomy implemented in the domain structure
firstgov as an example
canada has done this
public will be able to perform the tasks they want on gov't web sites
websites will be used to accomplish agency missions
leaders will 'get the web'
government search will improve dramatically
government websites do not come up well in results on Google
government websites are hard to search
websites will promote greater interaction between people and their government
e-democracy
census online
live help
content will be aggregated to serve the public
such as contact us. why find the agency first. have a federal-level contact us.
community-level information based on your location
personalized content for each citizen
government web managers will be judged by whether citizens can find what they need
Where Can I Buy Retin, Back at the beginning of October I spoke at the 2005 East Coast IA Retreat on Enterprise Information Architecture. Retin a 0 1, The presentation was about using the language of Enterprise Architects to talk about IA and particularly content management among enterprise planning folk. So I went over the Zachman Framework and offered ideas on how to extend the framework to accommodate user experience (and IA), strongest retin a. Retin a lawsuits, I am planning a more extensive post on the topic soon.
Several people expressed an interest in a download version of the diagram: original v1.0 | final v2.0. Version 2.0 extends and enhances the original, which I blogged about here: EIA in Context diagram, Where Can I Buy Retin.
I created this graphic to give everyone a starting point, acne message board retin a, Costco price retin a 0.1 price, a point of common understanding. The graphic depicts how enterprise information architecture (EIA) relates to enterprise content management (ECM), after i apply retin a oily. Retin a online pharmacy, I originally envisioned the two things as being part of the same overall process, but I came to a realization that they are better understood as two separate activities, ordering retin a acne cream. Face peeling with retin a, As I see it, ECM is a permanent ongoing process to control a never-ending stream of content - to file it, buying retin a in mexico, Retin a target, organize it, and deliver it to the people who need it, burn from retin a. Where Can I Buy Retin, EIA is the intelligence behind content management. Skin rejuvenation retin a, It translates user needs, business goals, retin a micro price, Retin a creme, policies, and standards into a coherent plan for content management, acne cream retin scar. Retin a loreal microdermabrasion, On the left side of the document are the inputs that inform and drive EIA. Even in organizations where there is no formal EIA, retin a micro negative opinions, Retin a anti aging, these kinds of inputs exist and are actively sculpting the content landscape. My diagram is pretty specific to the federal government landscape in the US, propecia online retin a australia, Retin a mexican pharmacies, but you can extrapolate the kinds of inputs that are relevant in your organization.
In the center of the diagram are the products of EIA, five kinds of structures, Where Can I Buy Retin. These structures are the key to everything, retin veins. Acne retin scars, In fact, that part makes me a bit nervous, because they are very hard to define in such a small space. For examples of search and navigation structures, see Lou Rosenfeld’s EIA Roadmap diagram.
On the right side of the diagram, we see how these structures help people create and catalog content, organize and publish collections, and filter and deliver content to audiences. They are the translation of an entire organization’s rules and knowledge into a set of rules that help people find and use content they need to get work done. That’s pretty powerful stuff.
Another aspect of the Enterprise Information Architecture in Context diagram (PDF)Buying Ambien, that people have asked about is the nature of the intersection between content and business process. As with any IA issue worth talking about, swollen tonsils from ambien, Ambien online ambien generic, it depends. I've identified four kinds of intersections between a business process and content, ambien where to buy. Generic name of ambien, There are probably more, but these four cover a lot of ground, midrin tranzadone lyrica ambien. Ambien cr cautions, So I put the out there for people to think about, comment on, free ambien cr 7 day trial, Sonata zolpidem sleeping pill buy ambien, and refine.
Business creates content (e.g, Buying Ambien. records resulting from a business process)
Business uses content (e.g, rozerem ambien. Ambien versus zolpidem, knowledge workers sharing documents to do their jobs)
Business is content (e.g. content management, when was ambien fda approved, Ambien cr 12.5mg, tagging, or publishing where the businessprocess exists to support content)
Content initiates business (e.g, otc ambien. Purchase free ambien cod online, online form submissions that kick off a business process)
These four kinds or modes of interaction are handy, but I also came up with another way of thinking about it (as I said, sublingual melatonin taper ambien, Danger ambien, it depends). Buying Ambien, You could also break it into separate but related business processes and leave content out of it. It is still heavily content-centric, ambien is it safe, Ambien directions, but given how crucial information is to nearly every organization, I think this bias is fair, ambien cr detox. Ambien tablet, There are three kinds of business operation:
Business operations This is the conduct of business to directly serve the mission of the organization. If you work for a bank, ambien mind, Ambien myathenia gravis, this would be finance. If you work in retail, buy ambien from china, Parenteral ambien, it would be sales. If you work in shipping, it would be logistics, Buying Ambien. We can also lump in administrative operations like human resources, ambien cr erowid, business administration and financial management here. It's the business of business.
Content operations Content operations deal with the creation, use, management, and publication of content. There are many points of intersection between content operations and business operations, since nearly all business operations work with content. The business operation is to do the work, therefore the content operation is to record or communicate the work.
EIA operations Lastly, there are EIA operations, which create the tools and structures to help people create, use, manage, and publish content. Buying Ambien, Essentially, for every point of intersection between business and content, there is a mediation that is the EIA operation. For example, when a writer finishes an article and submits it for approval, they tag it with metadata. What metadata they use and how it is stored and displayed is controlled by the EIA. We have a business process resulting in content, mediated through the EIA.
This is actually the model the diagram is based on.
| View | Upload your own
Where Can I Buy Retin, Back at the beginning of October I spoke at the 2005 East Coast IA Retreat on Enterprise Information Architecture. Retin a 0 1, The presentation was about using the language of Enterprise Architects to talk about IA and particularly content management among enterprise planning folk. So I went over the Zachman Framework and offered ideas on how to extend the framework to accommodate user experience (and IA), strongest retin a. Retin a lawsuits, I am planning a more extensive post on the topic soon.